Publication-grade research.
In 75 minutes. From $15.
Adversarial multi-model analysis through five iterative cycles, producing original analytical frameworks that senior think tank analysts would ship.
Five cycles. Twenty analytical passes. One original framework.
Each cycle builds on — and attacks — the one before it. The pipeline doesn't stop until an original, named analytical framework emerges.
FOUNDATION
Comprehensive mapping of the problem space. What's known, what's contested, what's assumed.
CHALLENGE
Find evidence that contradicts cycle 1. What survives the challenge? What doesn't?
CROSS-DOMAIN
Pull parallels from other fields and historical precedents. How have similar problems been resolved elsewhere?
STRESS-TEST
Identify the single assumption that, if wrong, breaks the framework. Propose what would need to be true.
INTEGRATION
Build an original named analytical framework. This is a hard requirement, not optional.
The economics aren't close
Svarix Deep Research
- •50–75 minutes per report
- •$15–25 per run (transparent pricing)
- •20 independent analytical passes
- •25+ emergence findings per run
- •28+ sources with citations
- •100% fact-check rate on latest run
Big 4 consulting
- •6–12 weeks per engagement
- •$50,000–$200,000 per engagement
- •Dependent on specific analyst availability
- •Not repeatable — rerun = another invoice
Original frameworks the pipeline has coined
Every Deep Research cycle 5 must produce a named analytical framework. These are real coinages from live runs.
SACOF
Systemic AI Chasm Optimization Framework
India's public sector AI as a "dual reality" — thriving basic automation coexisting with a systemic chasm resisting sophisticated AI.
Cost Paradox
A competitive advantage in one domain becomes a structural disadvantage in another. Low-cost base enables DPI but blocks elite AI talent acquisition.
Catalytic Labeling
Strategic use of an aspirational label to mobilise political will, even when the underlying tech is simpler. The label serves a narrative function.
Heterodox Enclaves
Protected zones inside rigid institutions that bypass systemic constraints to enable experimentation.
Systemic Homeostasis
The active pressure by which large bureaucratic systems re-assimilate or neutralise disruptive initiatives.
Dual Reality
Simultaneous existence of a success zone and a struggle zone, held apart by structural barriers and evidence gaps.
Optimized-for-X, Resistant-to-Y
Systems are actively optimised for specific objectives and inherently resist initiatives requiring conflicting conditions.
Enclave Imperative
The structural conclusion that creating protected enclaves is the ONLY currently viable mechanism for sophisticated AI to bypass systemic chasms.
Structural Invisibility of Opportunity Cost
The long-term benefits of sophisticated AI are systematically undervalued within existing decision calculus, making inaction invisible.
Read before you sign up
Eight published pieces. Every one is real Deep Research output.
India's AI Paradox
Why India's public sector thrives at basic automation but structurally resists sophisticated AI deployment.
Read report →Fusion's Commercial Horizon
Honest assessment of fusion energy commercialisation timelines, bottlenecks, and realistic first-movers.
Read report →India's 6G Crossroads
Strategic options, standards-body positioning, and the R&D investments that actually matter.
Read report →Beyond Rockets
Heavy-lift-to-orbit alternatives — space elevators, orbital rings, and what the physics actually permits.
Read report →Who this is for
- ✓Research directors at think tanks and policy institutes
- ✓Strategy consultancies (internal tooling)
- ✓Corporate R&D leaders scoping emerging-technology bets
- ✓Sovereign wealth funds and PE diligence teams
- ✓Government policy units
- ✓Academic research centres with limited budgets
What Deep Research is not
Straight talk on the limits. Better to know now.
Not real-time
Rigor takes 50 to 75 minutes. If you need an instant answer, use Intelligence OS instead.
Not a replacement for human judgment
Every published output is editorially reviewed before it ships. The pipeline is a force multiplier, not an autonomous analyst.
Not compliance-grade
Not for legal or medical determinations that require professional credentials. It's analysis, not professional advice.
Not uniformly strong across every domain
Strongest in policy, strategy, science, defence, and technology. Weaker in highly localised legal/regulatory specifics.
Read the output, not the sales copy
Eight published pieces. Go read one before deciding anything.